Principal Refund + Interest Is Recoverable as 'Arrears of Land Revenue' Under Section 40(1)
Parties: M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Multiple real estate developers challenged Recovery Certificates (RCs) issued by UP RERA under Section 40(1) of the RERA Act. The promoters argued that the literal wording of Section 40(1) mentions only 'interest or penalty or compensation', and therefore the principal refund amount ordered by the RERA Authority could not be recovered as arrears of land revenue through the District Collector. They also challenged the mandatory 100% pre-deposit condition for filing appeals under Section 43(5).
A 3-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court rejected the builders' hyper-technical objection and held that the principal refund and interest ordered under Section 18 form an indivisible composite sum. Interpreting Section 40(1) to exclude principal refund amounts would reduce the RERA Authority to a toothless body and defeat parliamentary intent. The Court further upheld the constitutional validity of the proviso to Section 43(5), ruling that a promoter cannot maintain an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal without first depositing 100% of the total amount payable to the allottee.