The Booking & Agreement: In January 2023, Siddharth and Meera Kapoor booked a 3BHK apartment in Sector 65, Gurugram. Their registered Builder-Buyer Agreement (BBA) specified a RERA Carpet Area of 1,250 sq. ft. (plus 110 sq. ft. exclusive balcony area) for a total base consideration of ₹1,50,00,000 (₹1.50 Crore)—establishing an effective rate of ₹12,000 per sq. ft. of carpet area. By October 2026, they had paid 95% of the price (₹1,42,50,000).
The PDI Discovery: In October 2026, the developer issued a Possession Intimation Letter demanding the final 5% installment (₹7,50,000) plus stamp duty. During the Pre-Delivery Inspection (PDI), Siddharth engaged a COA-licensed architect who conducted a room-by-room Bosch laser measurement strictly per Section 2(k) of RERA. The architect certified that the net usable floor area plus internal partition walls measured only 1,172 sq. ft.—a shortfall of 78 sq. ft. (6.24% smaller than promised) because the builder had quietly included external shaft walls and balcony projections inside the carpet area figure.
Worked Proportionate Refund Calculation for 78 Sq. Ft. Carpet Area Shortfall| Calculation Component | Formula / Basis | Amount / Value |
|---|
| Promised vs. Actual RERA Carpet Area | 1,250 sq. ft. (BBA) − 1,172 sq. ft. (Architect Laser Survey) | 78 Sq. Ft. Shortfall (6.24%) |
|---|
| Effective Per-Sq.-Ft. Carpet Rate | ₹1,50,00,000 Total Base Price ÷ 1,250 sq. ft. | ₹12,000 / sq. ft. |
|---|
| Proportionate Principal Refund Due | 78 sq. ft. × ₹12,000 per sq. ft. (Clause 1.7 Model BBA) | ₹9,36,000 |
|---|
| 5% GST Refund / Credit on Shortfall | 5% GST charged on ₹9,36,000 overbilled consideration | ₹46,800 |
|---|
| Statutory Interest (SBI MCLR + 2% = 10.95% p.a.) | Simple interest on ₹9,36,000 for 3.75 years (45 months) | ₹3,84,120 |
|---|
| Total Statutory Claim (Principal + GST + Interest) | Enforceable under RERA Sec 14/18 & Clause 1.7 | ₹13,66,920 |
|---|
The Statutory Action:When the builder's CRM refused to adjust the shortfall citing a “±5% tolerance clause”, Siddharth engaged LegalRecovery.in. An advocate served a 15-day statutory demand notice to the developer's Managing Director and Chief Architect, attaching the COA Architect Certificate and invoking Clause 1.7 of the Haryana RERA Model Agreement for Sale, Section 2(k), and Section 14 of RERA.
The Outcome (Day 14 Settlement):Faced with an undeniable Section 2(k) architect survey and the prospect of a project-wide RERA audit affecting 240 identical 3BHK units, the builder's legal department convened a joint laser re-verification on Day 9. On Day 14, the builder issued a Revised Final Possession Statement completely setting off the pending ₹7,50,000 final installment, crediting ₹46,800 GST, and transferring the balance ₹5,70,120 directly to Siddharth's bank account prior to Conveyance Deed registration.