Downstream P2P Crypto & Commercial Recipients Cannot Have Entire Bank Account Frozen
Parties: Tarun Kumar v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
The petitioner was an active peer-to-peer (P2P) cryptocurrency merchant registered on Binance who legitimately sold USDT to multiple buyers through banking channels. A buyer paid ₹68,000 using funds originating from an alleged cyber fraud committed in Ahmedabad. The Cyber Crime Police Station issued an omnibus Section 102 CrPC notice to the petitioner's bank, resulting in a total debit freeze on his entire operational savings account holding over ₹14,50,000, paralyzing his daily livelihood and business commitments.
The Gujarat High Court held that the police cannot unilaterally order banks to debit-freeze entire operational bank accounts of innocent downstream recipients who gave lawful valuable consideration. The High Court directed that the debit freeze be immediately quashed, restricting the police requisition strictly to a lien-only hold of ₹68,000 (the tainted sum), subject to the petitioner furnishing an indemnity undertaking before the Investigating Officer.