To illustrate statutory notice enforcement against Tata UniStore Limited, review this scenario reflecting typical e-commerce dispute patterns in India.
Matter: Ananya Deshmukh vs. Tata UniStore Limited & MerchantDispute Settled Pre-Litigation
Transaction History: On August 14, 2026, Ananya purchased a chronograph watch for ₹18,990 on Tata CLiQ Luxury. On delivery, she noticed micro-scratches on the bezel and requested a return within 48 hours.
The Breakdown: The courier collected the item with intact tags on August 20. On August 25, support emailed stating the merchant rejected the return during warehouse intake, alleging a replica was returned. Her ticket was closed.
The Legal Escalation: Ananya compiled her evidence: courier pickup SMS, unboxing photos, and invoice. Through an enrolled advocate, she issued a 15-day statutory demand notice addressed to:
Tata UniStore Limited (Corporate Legal Cell)
4th Floor, Empire Plaza 2, Chandan Nagar, LBS Marg, Vikhroli (West), Mumbai - 400083
Copy served to: grievanceofficer@tatacliq.com & Merchant Partner
The Outcome: Citing Rule 5(3) fallback liability and Praveen Kumar v. Tata Unistore Limited, the notice demanded refund release within 15 days. On Day 9 post-delivery, Tata UniStore’s legal desk intervened, reversed the transaction, credited ₹18,990 to her card, and added a ₹2,500 apology voucher.